The Hidden Test: Integrity, AI, and the Future of Leadership

Integrity isn’t tested under scrutiny—it’s tested in the quiet moments when no one is watching. In the corporate world, small ethical lapses can snowball into major scandals, and AI only amplifies these biases. From hiring discrimination to deepfake fraud, AI learns from human decisions, mirroring both strengths and blind spots. Leaders must take responsibility by auditing AI, ensuring transparency, and fostering ethical decision-making. The future of AI depends on the integrity we model today. Will you lead with ethics—or let bias dictate the future?

Read More

The AI Gold Rush: The FOMO Trap

The AI Gold Rush: Are You Falling for the FOMO Trap?

Everywhere you look, companies are bragging about their AI breakthroughs. Your competitors are “going all in.” Your LinkedIn feed is flooded with AI success stories. And now, you’re wondering—are we falling behind?

Here’s the truth: AI isn’t a strategy. It’s just a tool. Rushing in without a clear plan can lead to wasted resources, frustrated teams, and a whole lot of chaos.

The real winners? They’re not just following the hype. They’re strategically leveraging AI to create value, optimize operations, and gain a competitive edge.

So, are you leading the AI revolution—or just chasing the trend? Don’t get left behind.

Read More

AI and Humans: The Ultimate Collaboration

What Happens When AI and a Doctor Work as a Team?

Dr. Mehta, a seasoned radiologist, has a new assistant—an AI system that analyzes medical scans in seconds. But can AI truly match a doctor’s intuition? What happens when AI gets it wrong? And what about when AI catches something the doctor misses?

This blog dives into a fascinating, real-world partnership where AI and humans don’t compete—they complement each other. The result? Faster diagnoses, better patient care, and more time for what truly matters.

Curious to see how AI is changing the game? Let’s get started.

Read More

The Game-Changing Power of Purpose

Success without purpose is like running on a treadmill—you’re moving, but not getting anywhere. Blockbuster ignored purpose and lost to Netflix. BlackBerry missed the bigger picture, while Apple stayed true to its mission. Clayton Christensen’s How Will You Measure Your Life? warns leaders against chasing short-term wins at the cost of long-term fulfillment.

Whether in personal leadership, product development, or organizations, a clear purpose provides focus, flexibility, and fulfillment. It’s not just about winning—it’s about building something meaningful.

Are you leading with purpose or just reacting?

Read More

True Leadership: It’s Not the Title, It’s the Impact You Make

Leadership isn’t about titles or years of experience—it’s about the impact you make and the trust you build. A corner office or a fancy job title might give you authority, but it doesn’t make you a true leader. True leadership is about empowering those around you, unlocking their potential, and creating a culture where they feel safe to innovate and speak up. When you shift from a command-and-control approach to servant leadership, you empower your team to take ownership, push boundaries, and collaborate creatively. The real measure of leadership is the impact you have on others—not the position you hold. So, ask yourself: Are you leading, or just taking up space? Let’s explore how to lead with impact, create trust, and build a thriving team culture.

Read More

Leading vs. Managing: The Scrum Master Dilemma

In this blog, I explore the critical distinction between leadership and management, sparking a debate that often arises in Scrum workshops: “Is a Scrum Master a leader or a manager?” By examining the roles of both managers and leaders, I clarify how leadership goes beyond managing tasks and involves inspiring people. I highlight that while managers control resources and processes, leaders empower, motivate, and connect with their teams. The blog challenges Scrum Masters to reflect on their role—not just managing work, but encouraging an environment where teams are inspired to thrive and innovate.

Read More

Scrum Guide 2020 updates (compared to 2017)

2020 Scrum Guide is out and we thought of sharing some insights with you so you are aware of the changes. Scrum and it’s essence is the same and that means the core elements of the framework are still relevant. Here are a few things for you to remember –

Highlights of changes –

  1. Less prescriptive
  2. Introduction of Product Goal
  3. One Team (no sub-teams) and One Product focus
  4. Simplification of language (IT references removed) for wider audience

Prescriptions Removed –

Few prescriptions are removed. It doesn’t mean that those details are not relevant anymore. If your teams find these valuable, continuing with them is a good idea. However, if you want to experiment with different alternatives, give it a try.

Events:

  • Optional “three questions” for Daily Scrum removed
  • Sprint Retrospective commitments are no longer required in Sprint Backlog
  • Typical 10% capacity needed for Product Backlog Refinement (not a formal event) removed
  • Prescriptive elements about the events are condensed or removed (activities mentioned in 2017 guide are still valid, but teams can take up alternative approaches toward achieving the purpose)
  • Optional meeting after Daily Scrum for in-depth discussion

Artifacts:

  • Attributes of Product Backlog Items (Description, Order and Size) are optional
  • Monitoring progress towards the goals section
  • Product Owner decides when to release Increment

 

Product Goal –

It describes a future state of the product which can serve as a target for the Scrum Team to plan against. The long-term objective for the Scrum Team. They must fulfill (or abandon) one objective before taking on the next. Read more.

 

Artifacts Commitment –

Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism. Read more.

Artifact Commitment
Product BacklogProduct Goal
Sprint BacklogSprint Goal
IncrementDefinition of Done

 

Updates –

Development Team to Developers: There is no separate (Development) Team within the Scrum Team, thereby promoting ONE Scrum Team focused on the same objective.

From Roles to Accountabilities: This change has been introduced to stress on the accountabilities and not job titles. Scrum Team consists of three different sets of accountabilities – Product Owner, Developers and Scrum Master.

From Self-organize to Self-manage: “Scrum Team is self-managing, meaning they internally decide who does what, when, and how.” This change in term is a way of calling out that more empowered your Scrum Team is, the better their chances of success. Read more.

Introducing “Why” in Sprint Planning: Along with “What and “How”, Scrum Team discuss “Why is this Sprint valuable?” This provides the answer to decide the Sprint Goal. In essence, we would recommend starting your Sprint Planning with Why. Read more.

 

Other changes –

  • Suggested Scrum Team size of 10 or fewer people
  • Multiple increments can be created within a Sprint
  • Along with Empiricism, addition of “Lean Thinking” as a foundation of Scrum framework
  • Replacement of term “estimate” with “size”
  • The entire Scrum Team is accountable for creating a valuable, useful Increment every Sprint

“Patience” is the sixth Scrum value.

*Covid is a fictional character based on my imagination that represents the strain of CoronaVirus that is causing the disease Covid-19. This article discusses Business Agility and why some organizations are not able to reap the benefits Scrum has to offer. […]